|
|
Post by aka Kizza on Dec 7, 2009 17:12:37 GMT -5
|
|
haljackey
Sergeant 1st Class
100%
o_0
Posts: 57
|
Post by haljackey on Dec 7, 2009 20:54:31 GMT -5
256 players in 1 server?  Sounds like fun. But I just can't imagine a world with no BF2MC  |
|
yrian
Major
90%
Posts: 297
|
Post by yrian on Dec 8, 2009 2:07:36 GMT -5
maybe we can move on to cod4 or mw2
|
|
|
|
Post by scoperfin on Dec 8, 2009 7:12:37 GMT -5
Well, in my opinion, the CoD games are pretty addictive, but the lack of vehicles and large maps & no ability to VTK a player out during a game are BIG minuses for me.
Modern Warfare 2 is basically a more noob-friendly version of Modern Warfare 1, you get a lot of shit while going for a kill streak. Chopper gunner, AC-130 etc.
It ruins the game..oh, the tactical nuke (who the fuck even decided to implement that into the game?!) basically kills everyone on the map. You can use it after 25 succesful kills in a row WITHOUT dying. People now do this in pairs in a quiet area of a large map..the one who wants to get the nuke shoots the person 25 times. The other person who gets shot every time has Tactical Insertion, a perk which allows you to spawn near the player who killed you. Using this, they ruin the fucking game.
Games like Resistance 1, 2, Haze, Killzone 2, Uncharted 2 are very balanced online. They are also fun to play. The Call Of Duty 3 is still active on the PS3, on the PS2, not so much. Halo 3 is also very popular..
I'm a Sony fanboy at heart.
|
|
|
|
Post by aka Kizza on Dec 8, 2009 12:12:07 GMT -5
thats good info. i need a game with vehicles, its much more fun.
this sony MAG game with 256 players.... youre not gonna have 128 players on 1 team obeying commands/orders/working together.
it will be [glow=red,2,300]MAYHEM[/glow]
|
|
|
|
Post by scoperfin on Dec 16, 2009 15:03:22 GMT -5
Well, I do agree that some stupid kids might not be cooperative, but this game is gonna be the tactical gamer's dream (excluding Battlefield 2's Project Reality mod)
But I have done my research on this game & I think teamwork is a must if you want to be succesful in this game
The squad mechanics are well made
|
|
|
|
Post by Creamy_Mayo on Dec 19, 2009 10:50:59 GMT -5
Well, in my opinion, the CoD games are pretty addictive, but the lack of vehicles and large maps & no ability to VTK a player out during a game are BIG minuses for me. Modern Warfare 2 is basically a more noob-friendly version of Modern Warfare 1, you get a lot of shit while going for a kill streak. Chopper gunner, AC-130 etc. It ruins the game..oh, the tactical nuke (who the fuck even decided to implement that into the game?!) basically kills everyone on the map. You can use it after 25 succesful kills in a row WITHOUT dying. People now do this in pairs in a quiet area of a large map..the one who wants to get the nuke shoots the person 25 times. The other person who gets shot every time has Tactical Insertion, a perk which allows you to spawn near the player who killed you. Using this, they ruin the fucking game. Games like Resistance 1, 2, Haze, Killzone 2, Uncharted 2 are very balanced online. They are also fun to play. The Call Of Duty 3 is still active on the PS3, on the PS2, not so much. Halo 3 is also very popular.. I'm a Sony fanboy at heart. MW2 has some large maps that are good for sniping. Wasteland is one of em. The lack of vehicles is a big downer and no VTK sucks also, especially when you have a squecky-voiced kid screaming on the mic. I like the custom killstreaks AND totally disagree with you scoper. Despite the amount of different rewards you can get, it still only limits you too three. I have the Predator missle at 5 kills then a Harrier airstrike at 7 and finally a Pavelow heli at 9. Any kills I get after 9 in a row don't count for shit. |
|
|
|
Post by scoperfin on Dec 19, 2009 15:36:07 GMT -5
Fair enough.
|
|
Sounds like fun.
